Mathematics has been traditionally conceived of as a purely theoretical endeavor, founded in such esoteric fields of investigation as set theory and topology. That mathematicians eschew field work and data-gathering to test their theories can be readily ascertained by the style of dress and attention to personal appearance exhibited by most theoretical mathematicians. But in recent years a new and much more worldly branch of mathematics has made impressive strides. The authors present here a rigorous and empirically testable dog mathematics.
1. dogs + dogs = dogsIt is immediately apparent to the more mathematically astute reader that dog mathematics bears little relationship to garden-variety number theory. The oft-repeated claim that dog mathematics is inherently meaningless because of one of several variations on the following proof,
2. dogs - dogs = cats
3. cats + cats = -dogs
1. dogs + dogs = dogs [axiom 1]is a mere theoreticist ploy. No one has ever observed anyone subtracting dogs from both sides of anything.
2. dogs = dogs - dogs [subtracting dogs from both sides]
3. dogs = cats [as per axiom 2. patently absurd!]
4a. dogs * dogs = dogsDivision has rarely, if ever, been observed. Numerous animal species have been observed being divided by dogs and cats, in particular by wolves and lions. We hypothesize that the following relationships would obtain among dogs and their feline counterparts, if we could ever observe such events:
4b. cats * cats = cats
4c. dogs * cats = undefined
dogs / dogs = dogsObviously dogs and cats do not have roots[1]. They cannot be raised to powers; though dogs, especially retrievers, have been observed apparently in possession of small natural logs, which they carry in their mouths.
cats / dogs = dogs
cats / cats = cats
dogs / cats = cats
[1] One wonders, for instance, if theoretical mathematicians have ever seen a truly square root; the roots we have observed have all been gnarled.
[2] Although preliminary observations indicate that dogs + pie = dogs.